No-code scientific computing

Run materials calculations without writing code.

Choose a supported workflow, review the method, and inspect results together with their inputs and calculation settings.

Free research preview · No credit card · Usage limits apply

8.2M+ indexed papers  ·  9.1M+ material records

A supported starting point

Silicon: from a fixed structure to a calculation record

An introductory Quantum ESPRESSO workflow using a supplied silicon example. No structure upload or input-file editing is needed.

Input
Supplied Si crystal structure
Method
Fixed self-consistent field calculation
Result
Energy, calculation output and execution status
Inspect
Inputs, settings and linked provenance

Illustrative workflow — this summary is not a recorded run or a scientific benchmark.

Start with a concrete task

Supported materials research

Programming is optional. Understanding the method and deciding whether it fits your question still matters.

Try a silicon calculation

Start from the supplied silicon structure and a fixed Quantum ESPRESSO protocol. Review the method, confirm the run, and inspect its energy and outputs.

Introductory example only; arbitrary structures and methods are outside this workflow.

Compare materials data with literature

Search a materials question or composition across indexed datasets and papers. Follow references back to their sources before drawing a conclusion.

Coverage and reported properties vary by source; a retrieved value is not experimental validation.

Research sources and calculation programs

Literature sources

Semantic Scholar · OpenAlex

Materials datasets

Materials Project · OQMD · JARVIS-DFT · Alexandria

Programs used across supported calculation paths and published research

Quantum ESPRESSO · ABINIT · MACE (ML potential)

Program availability depends on the workflow. This is not a promise that every program supports the silicon example. Named projects do not endorse material.codes.

Get free access

Illustrative workflow

Review the method. Confirm the run. Inspect the result.

The fixed silicon example introduces the calculation path. It does not establish suitability for an arbitrary research problem.

  1. 1

    Choose the supported example

    Use the supplied Si structure and fixed self-consistent field protocol. Review its inputs and scope.

  2. 2

    Give consent before execution

    Check the calculation method and resource limit, then confirm the launch on platform resources. No queue commands to write.

  3. 3

    Read the result in context

    Follow execution status, then inspect energy and output files alongside the inputs and calculation settings. A completed job still needs scientific interpretation.

A result you can trace

Inspect the structure, method, parameters, program and output artifacts together. Execution history helps explain how the result was produced; it does not certify scientific correctness.

Powered by AiiDA for the new silicon workflow’s calculation records and provenance. WorkGraph coordinates execution; Slurm workload management queues jobs and assigns platform resources.

Published research

Results with their evidence attached

Battery cathode screening

Can a MACE screen preserve the voltage ordering of Materials Project cathode candidates? The published study compares the screen with reference DFT voltages and checks one candidate with Quantum ESPRESSO.

This is a ranking result under the study’s protocol, not proof of absolute voltage accuracy, synthesizability or cycling performance. See the report for geometries, parameters, reference data and caveats.

Read the study and its limitations

These historical results are separate from the new AiiDA silicon workflow. Publication does not establish availability of every research scenario in the preview.

Published runs

View published results

Access

Free research preview

Explore supported materials workflows free during preview. A short description of your research helps us review your request.

No credit card required. Usage limits apply.

A short research note helps automatic review. Once approved, we’ll email you a link to complete your registration. Submitting a request does not create an account or guarantee approval.

Also available through MCP

Connect supported search and research tools to an MCP-compatible client using an API key from the Lab. Read the integration documentation for available tools and setup.

Your research note is optional and cannot be added to this request later.

Request received

We received your request for . Once approved, we’ll send a separate email with a link to complete your registration.

This confirmation does not mean access is approved or a registration email has been delivered.

We already have that address

You entered . If you already have an account, sign in. Otherwise, registration is completed using the email link sent after approval.

Didn’t receive an email?

Check the address above and your spam folder. Look for “Your material.codes invitation”, the email containing your registration link. A request confirmation is a different email.

If this address has an eligible invitation, we’ll email a registration link. If you already have an account, sign in. For help, contact info@material.codes.

Sign in Get help

Where the platform is going

Future direction

Your Slurm cluster

We plan to let teams run supported workflows on their own Slurm resources through the platform.

Future direction

Private deployment

A future deployment option would bring the platform into an organization’s own infrastructure.

Future directions are not available in the current release. No delivery dates are announced.